Assessing climate‑smart agroforestry practices: A study of tree species composition, distribution, and utilities in two contrasting agroecosystems of Rwanda

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNtawuruhunga,Donatien
dc.contributor.authorNgowi,Edwin Estomii
dc.contributor.authorMangi,Halima Omari
dc.contributor.authorSalanga,Raymond John
dc.contributor.authorLeonard,Kenneth Lynch
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-24T06:13:53Z
dc.date.available2025-07-24T06:13:53Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionJournal Article
dc.description.abstractTree adoption on farms has expanded around the world in the last years due to food security concerns and is expected to further spread due to climate change. Climate-smart agroforestry (CSAF), a smart farming approach, is one of these farming patterns. In this study, we (a) analyzed the distribution and composition of trees in CSAF systems, (b) assessed tree diversity in CSAF systems, (c) analyzed CSAF best management practices, and (d) evaluated CSAF-derived utilities in two contrasting agroecological zones of Rwanda. In particular, species composition, diversity, richness, evenness, and similarity were estimated across land use types. Utility data were recorded as fulfilled goals from different practices. Home gardens, alley cropping, improved fallow, multipurpose trees, plantation crop combination, shelterbelts/windbreaks, and silvopasture are the predominant CSAF practices in Bugesera and Rulindo with different structures and compositions. Results highlighted that tree species diversity, richness, dominance, and importance decrease from Rulindo to Bugesera (H′ = 1.397–1.247), ( Dmg = 0.621–0.368), (D = 0.192–0.117), (IVI = 58.42–58.02). Moreover, farmers seemed to give more weight to utilities from goods meant for household survival such as fruits (home consumption), fuelwood (culinary), fodder (cattle-housed for zero-grazing), and standing trees (stakes for climbing crops). Logs, and poles/timber meant for commercial purposes were given the least weight. Introducing and upscaling fruit tree species on farms can be one of the best alternatives to improve local climate-resilient landscapes and livelihoods. The outcomes of this study can support the targeting of agricultural interventions and innovations in resource-poor settings struggling with food security challenges.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-01063-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/6896
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectSmart farming
dc.subjectClimate resilience
dc.subjectAdoption
dc.subjectFood security
dc.subjectManagement practices
dc.subjectRwanda
dc.titleAssessing climate‑smart agroforestry practices: A study of tree species composition, distribution, and utilities in two contrasting agroecosystems of Rwanda
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Agroforestry - Springer.pdf
Size:
1.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Commercial,contact author
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Articles, Conference and Workshop Papers Collection