Welcome to SUAIRE

Sokoine University of Agriculture  Institutional Repository (SUA IR). This repository was built and is maintained by the university library  (Sokoine National Agricultural Library-SNAL) , in order to collect, preserve and disseminate scholarly output generated by University research community (staff and students) members.

This repository hosts a variety of openly accessible materials including: scholarly articles and books, theses and dissertations, conference proceedings and technical reports. For assistance about depositing your research output in the repository click here. SUA IR Policy  click here or any queries contact us at snal@sua.ac.tz.

Photo by @Sokoine University of Agriculture
 

Communities in SUAIRE

Select a community to browse its collections.

Now showing 1 - 5 of 15

Recent Submissions

Item
GIS application in rangeland management in Tanzania: a systematic review
(Rangeland Society of Tanzania (RST), 2023) Nzunda, Emmanuel F.; Yusuph, Amri S.
A good proportion of the aspects of range resource management are amenable to GIS technology because range resource management integrates spatial and non-spatial aspects of data and information for which GIS is best suited. Whether this amenability is exploited was questionable and needed evidence- based research to confirm. The current paper presents the results of a systematic review of the application of GIS in rangeland management in Tanzania. The specific objectives of the study were: (1) to assess the distribution of the publications by year of publication; (2) to examine the distribution of the publications by subject area; (3) to analyse the relationships among key words used in titles and abstracts of the publications; (4) to describe details of a sample of selected publications, and; (5) to evaluation the distribution of publications by institution of the authorship. The study used the PRISMA method in searching, selecting and analysing the publications. Records were retrieved from Google scholar, Scopus, and science direct. We included 80 English language studies done in Tanzania for the first four specific objectives and 136 for the fifth specific objective. There is an increasing trend of application of GIS from 1 study in 1993 and years close by to 11 publications in 2021. About 34%, 31%, 27% and 8% of the publications applied GIS respectively in environmental science, earth and planetary sciences, agricultural and biological sciences and social sciences. The words μchange¶, μaUea¶ and μTan]ania¶ ZeUe Whe moVW fUeqXenWl\ XVed in WiWleV and abstracts. Furthermore, words in titles and abstracts formed about five clusters representing study area (e.g. Tanzania), method of analysis (e.g. remote sensing, assessment, data), topic of study (e.g. change, land use, land, conservation) and land use (e.g. grassland, woodland, forest). Most words clustered close WogeWheU foUming a meVhZoUk bXW Whe ZoUd μconflicW¶ ZaV Whe moVW distant from the rest of the meshwork. GIS data sets used included land use land use/cover (LULC) layer, landscape features (e.g. rivers, roads, topographic variables) and socioeconomic data. Most publications came from Sokoine University of Agriculture, University of Dar es Salaam and Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology while the fewest came from Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Hohenheim University and the University of British Columbia respectively. It is concluded that GIS is increasingly being applied to rangeland management. However, social sciences apply GIS the least. Tanzanian institutions lead in application of GIS technology, which means it is no longer foreign expertise. It is recommended that all fields apply GIS wherever appropriate. In particular, why GIS is least applied in social sciences aspects of rangeland management needs further investigation.
Item
The use of a heritage cattle breed as an adaptation strategy to new challenges imposed by climate change in Chihuahuan desert rangelands in the Southwest United States
(Rangeland Society of Tanzania (RST), 2023) Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia; Cibils, Andres F.; Estell, Richard E.; Utsumi, Santiago A.; McIntosh, Matthew M.; Spiegal, Sheri
This review synthesizes research comparing conventional (Angus X Hereford; AH) vs. heritage (Raramuri Criollo; RC) cattle foraging behavior, heat tolerance, and cow-calf interactions using telemetry devices in the context of determining adaptation strategies related to climate change effects. The AH and RC cows grazed separately in two adjacent pastures in a crossover design during summer and winter for three consecutive years. Rectal fecal samples were collected twice (day 14 and 28) in each experimental period and fecal-DNA (fDNA) meta-barcoding analyses were performed to characterize diet compositions. A subgroup of individuals in each herd was fitted with sensors to track their location (GPS collars), body temperature (iButton thermal loggers), and cow-calf contact events (proximity loggers). The RC cows traveled farther, spent less time resting, more time grazing, and explored larger areas than AH cows. The RC cows showed a stronger preference for ecological patches with greater shrub density and avoided areas with a high density of black grama (an ecologically sensitive forage species) during winter (period when vegetation is most vulnerable). Our fDNA study revealed that RC cows select less black grama and more mesquite than their AH counterparts, which corroborated our vegetation electivity findings. During summer, RC cows maintained a lower internal body temperature than their AH counterparts, providing evidence of heat tolerance in RC. The RC calves appeared to impoVe feZeU conVWUainWV on WheiU damV¶ moYemenW paWWeUnV; nursing RC dams covered a daily grazing area almost three times larger than AH dams. Differences in foraging strategies documented in this review support our hypothesis that RC (heritage breed) cattle are better equipped to cope with hotter and drier climates and are better able to adjust their grazing behavior according to forage availability.
Item
Chemical composition and physical characteristics of standing hay and foggage along the pasture field in Morogoro sub-urban, Tanzania
(Rangeland Society of Tanzania (RST), 2022-12) Venance S. Tarimo; Ephraim J. Mtengeti
In-situ forage conservation in the form of standing hay is the commonest and cheapest form of natural pasture conservation by most agro-pastoral and pastoral communities in Sub-Saharan Africa. Standing hay is over matured and un-harvested pasture (mainly annual grasses). On the other hands, excessively overstays standing hay in the field until the first rain a shower of the next season is referred as foggage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutritive value of the standing hay and foggage of natural pastures plot rested for entire wet (growing) and dry periods for nine months until the first rains. Standing hay samples were taken three months before the rains while those of foggage were obtained three weeks after the first rains. Ten samples were taken at random from a standing hay and foggage for determination of botanical and nutritive composition. Standing hay and foggage did not differ significantly (P ≥ 0.05) in terms of dry matter (DM) content (85.9 % vs 83.1 %), Crude protein (3.8 % vs 3.3%), in vitro dry matter digestibility (34 % vs 32 %), metabolizable energy (5.3 vs 5.2 MJ/kg DM). However, standing hay had significantly (P ≤ 0.05) less Neutral Detergent Fiber (80 vs 82 %) and more leaf:stem ratio (2:1 vs 1.4:1) than oggage. In terms of organoleptic test scores standing hay and foggage were not significantly (P ≥ 0.05) in touch and pollution but foggage had significantly ((P≤ 0.05) mouldy appearance and bad smell than standing hay. It can be concluded that tropical natural pastures standing hay and foggage have low nutritive value yet the foggage is very fibrous which can reduce the productivity of grazing animals.
Item
Rangeland management practices in changing environment: implications for land use and climate change in selected African countries
(Rangeland Society of Tanzania (RST), 2023-04) Kilemo,Dominico Benedicto
Rangeland Management entails rangeland resource management for improved animal production and other ecosystem services. While Africa is endowed with spectacular rangelands which support biodiversity, animal production and people's livelihoods, they face pressure from anthropogenic activities such as overgrazing which leads to land degradation and conversion of rangelands into other land uses. Furthermore, the quality of pastures fed to livestock has implications on feed efficiency and methane gas emission. Rangeland management interventions which enhance the carbon sequestration function of rangelands and reduce enteric methane emission from livestock have a potential of mitigating global warming and climate change. This paper reviews different rangeland management approaches for animal production and assesses their contribution to climate change in some African countries. Such approaches include (i) Community Based Natural Resource Management; (ii) Land and water use planning; (iii) marketing and alternative income; and(iv) wildlife and nature tourism. The findings suggest that, the adoption of SRM approaches is very low with less than 25 cases across Africa. This suggests that the existing SRM interventions have had little contribution to climate change mitigation. The 74 implementation of approaches such as village land use planning, legalization of the customary land right to grazing areas, establishment of mini ranches and the establishment of improved pasture species with low GHG emission will significantly contribute to sustainable range management and climate change mitigation in Africa.
Item
Livestock population and role of land use planning on sustainable grazing land management: case of Tanganyika district, Katavi region
(Rangeland Society of Tanzania (RST), 2023) Hieronimo, Proches; Mbungu, Winfred
The aim of the study was to assess the trend of livestock population and contribution of land use planning process towards development and implementation of sustainable grazing land management, reconciling land use with environmental concerns and resolve potential conflicts between sectoral interests and potential uses as well as increasing land tenure security and clarify customary land tenure of grazing lands (communal lands) as per requirement of national policies and laws. The study employed Land Degradation Surveillance Framework (LDSF) as tools to realize the study aims. Results from the livestock data in the district show that there is an increasing number of livestock, and in particular cattle increased from about 39600 in the year 2006/2007 to about 316651 recorded in the year 2016/2017 in the Tanganyika district. This signifies that the district experienced almost 700% increase in cattle from 2006 to 2017. In the year 2018, Lwega village located within the Mwese ward contributed 20950 cattle (55%) out of the 37834 in the Mwese ward. Land use planning process was carried out in the Lwega village as pilot village to enable setting aside areas for various uses including grazing land and issuance of Certificate of Customary Right of Occupancy (CCRO) in grazing land and other communal lands. The process enabled setting aside grazing land of total area of 12,955 ha (which is 26% of the whole village land) for the village with a total of 12,736 Livestock (with a total of 11,359 cows) by 2020 and which is expected to have a total of 15,193 Livestock (with a total of 13,313 cows) by 2030 based on the number of livestock found within new village boundary which was resurveyed in 2020. The requirement of grazing land was 20,579 ha which would have been sufficient for the planning period of 10 years i.e. from 2020 to 2030. This has a deficit of 7,625 ha and therefore this calls for a further study which will provide recommendations for interventions to improve rangeland quality and advise on restoration techniques of the currently degraded rangeland including enrichment planting and identify species of interest taking into account their palatability, intake, digestibility, and nutrient content for future reseeding programs or other measures including destocking.