Beyond access to finance: youth motivations, loan utilization, and repayment behaviour in local government soft loan schemes in rural Tanzania
Loading...
Date
2026
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sokoine University of Agriculture
Abstract
Access to affordable finance remains a critical barrier for rural youth in Tanzania, where stringent collateral
requirements by commercial banks systematically exclude young people from formal credit markets. In response, Local
Government Authorities have implemented soft loan schemes targeting youth groups to foster entrepreneurship and economic
inclusion. This mixed-methods study investigates youth motivations for accessing soft loans, utilization and investment
patterns, and determinants of repayment success in Morogoro Rural District. We surveyed 200 youth loan beneficiaries
through stratified random sampling, conducted focus group discussions with 16 participants from 14 youth groups, and
interviewed three district officials. Quantitative data were analyzed using STATA version 18 for descriptive statistics, chi-
square tests, and binary logistic regression, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti version 25.
Findings reveal that structural features, such as absence of collateral and zero-interest rates, were primary motivators for
loan uptake. However, a significant proportion of beneficiaries partially diverted funds toward household consumption needs
due to economic pressures. Agriculture dominated investment choices, though technical capacity gaps led to substantial
losses. Peer influence motivated participation but often propagated misinformation regarding repayment obligations. Logistic
regression identified key predictors of repayment success: fully collective (OR = 3.434, p = 0.001) and mixed investment
models (OR = 2.129, p = 0.027), alignment with stated purposes (full alignment OR = 4.789, p = 0.001; partial alignment OR
= 2.440, p = 0.025), agricultural investments (OR = 2.489, p = 0.013), motivation by no collateral requirement (OR = 2.201,
p = 0.014), and more recent loan cohorts (2023–2024; OR = 2.435, p = 0.003). Peer influence reduced the odds of repayment
success (OR = 0.508, p = 0.019). We conclude that while LGA soft loans enhance financial access, sustainable impact
requires integrated support systems addressing technical capacity, household survival pressures, misinformation, group
governance, and continuous monitoring. Policy recommendations include mandatory pre-disbursement training, strengthened
monitoring and evaluation, targeted communication to combat misinformation, support for sectoral diversification, and
promotion of genuine collective enterprises
Description
Journal article
Keywords
Youth financial inclusion, Soft loan schemes, Loan utilization patterns, Repayment behavior, Rural entrepreneurship