Rapid appraisal of policies &institutional frameworks for agricultural water management
Loading...
Date
2007-11
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
(IMAWESA)
Abstract
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of the country study was to investigate how policies or institutional frameworks affected or
would have affected agricultural water management (AWM) programmes or projects between 1985 and
2005. The study was designed with five outputs, namely to: i) articulate key policies that had or would
have had impact on AWM over different periods between 1985 and 2005,;ii) articulate key institutional
frameworks (legal, regulatory and organizational) that had or would have had impact on AWM over
different policy periods between 1985 and 2005; iii) determine quantitatively and/or qualitatively, the
impact of policies and institutional frameworks on the access of smallholders to agricultural water, and
performance and outcomes of relevant AWM programmes or projects; iv) assess the necessary and
optimal stakeholder participation in AWM policy formulation process; and v) document the process of
analysis of the policy and institutional framework for AWM.
The methodology for carrying out the study involved identification of policies, institutional frameworks
and AWM programmes and projects operated between 1985 and 2005. This process was followed by
collection of relevant documents relating to the same from concerned programmes, projects, offices, line
ministries, the Internet, and conducting limited interviews. Through desk review of documents of several
policies, institutional frameworks, programmes and projects, relevant information was extracted.
The study found several issues regarding policies and institutional frameworks that had impact on
programme and project performance and impact and are explained below.
• Policies recognized the importance of agricultural water in increasing agricultural productivity;
however, in the past policies (1985 – 1996), agricultural water was envisioned from the perspective
of large scale irrigation. Most of the programmes/projects on AWM analyzed in this study lacked
the components of rainwater harvesting (RWH). Recently, other components of AWM particularly
RWH, which has a strong bearing on smallholder farmers for crop and livestock production, have
been recognized in the policy arena.
• The issue of linkage to markets, as a policy issue, was not considered in the design of AWM
projects, especially those undertaken in the first policy period (1985-1996/97). Such supply biased
AWM efforts did not assure farmers of meaningful returns from their investments (labour, land
and water). Disconnection to profitable markets undermined farmers’ participation. Even where
productivity was improved it was not sustained after the project. This is because of lack of a
demand-pull effect that would have assured farmers profitable returns to investment.
• The implication of institutional frameworks on AWM is far-reaching. The effects of some
regulations might seem to be distant to issues of AWM, but this study has proved otherwise. For
instance, the public procurement procedures proved to be the critical problem which affected
AWM programmes and projects. Bureaucratic procedures embedded in the public procurement
processes with aspects of tendering and contracting, caused serious delays in project
implementation.
• Furthermore, where the Government, which is the institution managing the procurement, had a
share to contribute in the project budget, the disbursement of the funds was not timely and always
less than the promised amount.
• Most documents of programmes and projects on AWM claimed to have improved access of poor
rural people to improved water management. For example, the smallholder development project
for marginal areas in Chikuyu irrigation scheme realized yield increment from 1.2 tons/ha before
project intervention to 4.0 tons/ha after the project. Interventions of the Traditional Irrigation and
Environmental Organization have influenced the willingness of individual farmers to invest in
AWM.
• Though programmes and projects registered positive impact on poor rural people, participation by
farmers in programmes and projects has remained a problem even though the policies and
institutional frameworks urge for local participation. Farmers are engaged at some point in the
course of the project and are always left out during design, or their views are overruled by the
technocrats. For example, in the Usangu Village Irrigation Project, farmers were engaged at the
implementation stage during construction of an intake. Although the project started with prior
discussion with leaders, the leaders did not convey the message to farmers.
iii
IMAWESA Policy Study for Tanzania
• Stakeholders’ participation has been the strong component in the process of formulation of
policies used by this study to draw lessons. Stakeholders were involved from different domains,
ranging from technocrats, donors, private sector, public sector, farmers and the general public.
From the general public, special groups such as persons with disabilities, persons living with
HIV/AIDS, widows, youth and women were involved in the national wide consultation process.
Based on the findings, the following policy-relevant recommendations are made:
• To fast-track significant and rapid growth in the agriculture sector which is required in poverty
reduction, AWM interventions should, apart from conventional irrigation, embark on other
components of agricultural water such as RWH and water innovations in rainfed systems.
• The paradigm of ‘local participation’ has to be reexamined. A mere presence of farmers in the
dialogues that overrule their opinions is not what is meant by participation. Participation of farmers
at certain stages especially during implementation as opposed to planning is not participation. The
PADEP approach has to be adapted in the future AWM programmes. Smallholder farmers have to
identify sub projects and be facilitated to put down proposals and action plans.
• Reforms are needed in the regulatory frameworks such as public procurement procedures to make
them less bureaucratic. The tendering, contracting and pre-qualification requirements are lengthy
and highly procedural. One body can be formed in the agricultural ministry to deal with
agriculture-related procurements, as agriculture projects are sensitive to time.
• Participation of stakeholders in policy formulation process is vital in determining how the policies
will be actualized. Although a good mix of stakeholders was involved in the policy formulation
process, the participatory structures were formed on ad hoc basis. We recommend that a standard
way of obtaining the mix and contributions be developed that can be adapted in the formulation of
different policies
Description
Report
Keywords
Improved management, Agricultural water, Southern Africa