dc.description.abstract |
Introduction
Kongwa weed (Astripomoea hyoscyamoides Vatke Verdc.) is noxious weed species
in Tanzania which is defined as an unusual species that pose harmful effect to other
species and ecosystems hence causing significant economic damage in grassland and
cropland as well as natural areas. Recently, there is a decline of livestock production
due to insufficient animal feeds resulting from diminishing of pasture in range land
caused by weeds infestation. This study aimed to develop integrated management
strategies and technologies for management of Kongwa weed so as to increase
livestock production by improving the natural pasture in grazing land. Specifically,
the study sought: (1) To determine efficacy of selected plant species for allelopathic
effects against Kongwa weed, (2) To evaluate the effectiveness of selected cultural,
biological and chemical methods singly or in combination as management options
against Kongwa weed and (3) To establish the most economical integrated weed
management option(s) for controlling the Kongwa weed. The first chapter contains
general introduction, the second, third and fourth chapter in the dissertation comprise
manuscripts in the form of publishable papers which cover the first, second and third
specific objectives while chapter five covers general conclusion and
recommendation.
Methods
With respect to specific objective 1, the study was conducted in a screen house in
two phases. The experiment was laid out in factorial experiment; the pots were
2
arranged in a randomized complete block design with 12 treatment combinations
replicated four times. Factor A contained three types of plant extracts (M. azedarach,
R. communis and N. tabacum) and factor B contained four concentration levels (0.0,
2.5, 5.0 and 10 g l-1). Data were collected for plant growth parameters14 to 60 days
after sowing in seven days intervals. Data was analyzed using GenStat software
(version 16). Turkey's significant test at 5% level of significance. The study was
conducted in two sites located in Sejeli ward, Kongwa district. Site A and B
contained five and 12 treatments as weed management options applied in paddocks
occupied with Cenchrus ciliaris and Cynodon dactylon, respectively. The
experimental layout in site A and B followed a randomized complete block design
with four replications. Data were collected for plant growth parameters 7 to 35 days
after treatment application at seven days interval. Data was analyzed using GenStat
software (version 16). Turkey's significant test at 5% level of significance. The
economic analysis of natural pasture production and weed management package
were carried out based on benefit cost ratio using partial budget analysis per
objective 3. The variable costs for purchasing inputs, acquiring of plant materials and
labour cost calculated by working out expenditure using prevailing price on different
aspects of weed management and gross income under different treatments. The net
return and cost-benefit ratio were also calculated to determine the feasibility of the
treatments. Data collected from two sites were used to estimate the profitability of
pasture yield under different weed management options. The return produced from
each treatment was found by multiplying the pasture yield by the market price.
3
Findings
Results revealed that, the allelopathic effect of M. azedarach, R. communis at 10 g l-
1concentration showed significant effect at (P≤0.05) on weed height, girth, leaves,
leaf area and chlorophyll contents in phase I and II. Significant effect at (P≤0.05)
were recorded for treatments applied at concentration level of 10 g l-1 followed by 5
g l-1. Similar effects were observed on chlorophyll contents and number of survived
weed at the same concentration in phase I and II. Results showed that, at site A
treatment M. azedarach significantly affected the number of Kongwa weed survivors
(5) and number of weed leaves (7). Similar effect was observed on pasture DM yield
of (8.9 ton ha-1) in the same treatments at P<0.001. However results on site B showed
that, number of weed leaves (14), height (37.55 cm) and girth (3 mm) were
significantly affected at P<0.001 by 2,4-D treatment, while cutting + M. azedarach
treatment significantly affected weed survivor (10) at P<0.001 compared to other
applied treatments. Further, hand pulling + M. azedratch and cutting + 2, 4-D had
significant influence on pasture DM yield of 14.02 ton ha-1 at P<0.001 compared to
other treatments. However, the highest profits of controlling Kongwa weed was
obtained from M. azedarach (TSh. 435 555.00 ha-1) and 2, 4-D (TSh. 232 053.00 ha-
1) treatments resulted from the mean pasture MD yield of 8.94 t ha-1 and 6.58
respectively. While at site B, the highest net profit were recorded from treatments on
hand pulling + M. azedarach TSh.928 328.00 ha-1 followed by cutting + 2, 4-D TSh.
749 577 ha-1), 2, 4-D (TSh.682 949.00 ha-1) and hand pulling + 2, 4-D (TSh. 648
281.00 ha-1) with the average pasture DM yield of 14.02 t ha-1, 14.02 t ha-1, 12.76 t
ha-1 and 12.10 t ha-1 table 4.3 and 4.4 respectively.
4
Conclusion
The study concludes that M. azedarach is an important plant species in controlling
Kongwa weed due to its allelopathic effect and thus it can be used as a bio-herbicidal
plant for controlling the weed compared to R. communis and N. tabacum. However,
all allelochemicals activities depend on the level of concentration applied. Therefore,
appropriate weed control provided a favourable environment for the pasture growth
and development. Integrated weed management option was more effective than
single treatment when applied in high weed infestation. Where single treatment was
applied, lower yield and marginal return was consistently achieved compared to
where supplemented by a combination of treatments.
Recommendations
For sustainable ecosystems, M. azedarach and R. communis should be used as bioherbicides
in managing Kongwa weed in rangelands as an alternative to industrial
herbicides. Concentration (10 g l-1) of M. azedarach and R. communis should be used
in open field particularly grazing lands. Integrated weed management option applied
in high weeds infestation and herbicides or plant extracts applied singly in low weeds
infested range lands are recommended. The study suggests weeds management
practices; cutting + 2, 4-D, Hand pulling + M. azedarach and hand pulling + 2, 4-D
to reduce Kongwa weed in grazing lands consequently minimising the cost of
production required for forage optimum yield and increased profitability. |
en_US |