Abstract:
Introduction
Several studies have reported the failure of single-drug treatment
regimens for bacterial infections due to emergence of bacterial resistance.
Hence, there has been a growing interest in researching and developing
new antibacterial drugs, containing several combined ingredients as one of
the means to combat bacterial resistance. Among the successful reported
antibacterial combination treatments include herb-herb and herb-antibiotic.
This study investigated the antibacterial effects of single and combined
extracts from leaves, stems and root barks of Commiphora
swynnertonii and Synadenium glaucescens. In addition, the study
evaluated antibacterial effects of combined crude extracts of two medicinal
plants, also the extracts were combined with selected three antibiotics
namely ciprofloxacin, ampicillin, and erythromycin.
Methods
C. swynnertonii and S. glaucescens were respectively collected from
Manyara and Njombe regions of Tanzania. The standard antibiotics used
as positive control in this study were gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin,
and erythromycin. Extraction of plant materials was done by soxhlet and
macerations methods using dichloromethane and methanol solvents
respectively. The extracts were assessed for their effects on Gram-positive
bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis) and Gram-
negative
bacteria
(Escherichia
coli, Klebsiella
pneumonia, and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa). Minimum
Inhibitory
Concentrations (MIC) was determined by broth micro dilution method while
Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices were calculated from MIC
values of individual and combined crude extracts to determine combination
effects.
Findings
Strong antibacterial activities were demonstrated by all extracts of S.
glaucescens (MIC 0.01-0.37mg/mL) and methanol extracts of C.
swynnertonii (MIC 0.04-0.37mg/mL) against Gram-positive bacteria
Synergistic effect was observed in combination of methanol extracts of C.
swynnertonii stem barks and S. glaucescens leaves against S.aureus
(∑FIC 0.5), other synergistic effects were observed against E. faecalis in
combination of dichloromethane extracts of C. swynnertonii stem barks and S. glaucescens stem barks (∑FIC 0.5), and C. swynnertonii root barks
and S. glaucescens root barks (FIC index 0.3). For the remaining
combinations of crude extracts, mainly additive effects were observed. The
combinations of crude extracts with antibiotics revealed synergism when
ciprofloxacin was combined with all tested crude extracts against E.
coli (ΣFIC of 0.02), combination of ciprofloxacin with extract from root
barks of C. swynnertonii (ΣFIC of 0.5) against S. aureus, root barks of S.
glaucescens (ΣFIC of 0.1) against S. aureus and combination of ampicillin
with all tested crude extracts (ΣFIC of 0.03-0.1) against E. faecalis.
Nevertheless, antagonism was observed between the combinations of
ampicillin and erythromycin with all tested crude extracts against Gram-
negative bacteria (ΣFIC of 4-8).
Conclusions
When two or more plant parts are combined among themselves or with
antibiotics, the resulting antibacterial effects may either be synergistic,
additive or antagonistic depending on the phytochemical contribution of
each plant or part and also the bacteria or diseases intended.
Recommendations
Synergistic effects demonstrated in this study provide promising good
combinations to be considered as alternative antimicrobials. Toxicity
studies of the combinations of S. glaucescens stem barks of and C.
swynnertonii leaves and S. glaucescens root barks and C. swynnertonii
root barks which showed synergistic effects against Gram-positive bacteria
are recommended in the future.