• English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
    Communities & Collections
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
SUAIRE
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Mkoga, Z. J."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of the effectiveness of commonly used irrigation scheduling approaches on land and water productivity
    (2008-06) Kihupi, N.; Tarimo, A. K. P. R.; Bjerkholt, J. T.; Mkoga, Z. J.; Mbozil, A. F
    A field experiment was conducted to study the impacts of different irrigation schedules on land and water productivity of a bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop. Three irrigation scheduling methods were evaluated using a randomised complete block design., one based on historical climatic data (water balance), a second one based on neutron probe soil moisture measurements and the third one based on normal practices of farmers in the area (farmer-managed schedule). Irrigation water applications and crop water use were monitored throughout the growing season. The mean total water delivery under farmer- managed plots was 735mm which is more than adequate for a bean crop whose water requirement for maximum production varies between 300 and 500mm depending on climate. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in irrigation water productivity (IWP) and field water application efficiency (FAE) among treatments. The IWP and FAE of farmer-managed schedule were significantly lower than the other treatments, but the F AE of the control plot and climatic data plot did not differ significantly (P < 0.05). On the other hand, there was no significant difference (P<0.05) in physiological water use efficiency (PWUE) among treatments. Land productivity was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the climatic data based schedule than the other methods. It would thus appear that the water budget technique based on average climatic data is a suitable irrigation scheduling criterion which saved irrigation water while achieving maximum yield, optimum water productivity and field application efficiency. Low field application efficiencies under farmers' management practices indicate a need for improvement in water management strategies of individual farmers. This would go a long way to improving both water and land productivities.

Sokoine University of Agriculture | Copyright © 2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback