Abstract:
Individuals may display different preferences for food regulations when acting as a voting citizen than as
a buying consumer. In this paper, we examine whether such a duality exists between citizens and consumers
in the willingness to pay for food safety standards in restaurants. Using a split-sample willingness
to pay survey, we find that individuals exhibit a higher willingness to pay for improved food safety
standards in restaurants when acting as voting citizens than as buying consumers. Relying on consumer
studies that focus on the buying context may therefore underestimate the support found among the
public for new food regulations. This finding is important for policy makers using consumer studies in
decision support and for researchers attempting to understand individual preferences
