Sokoine University of Agriculture

Commercialization pathways and their implications on smallholder rice farmers’ productivity and welfare in Mbarali district, Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rashid, F. N.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-23T10:06:54Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-23T10:06:54Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri https://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/3477
dc.description A Dissertation 2019 en_US
dc.description.abstract Agricultural transformation from low productivity to commercial agriculture has been a policy of concern in Sub-Saharan African countries whose economies depend on agriculture. Different pathways to commercialization have been adopted, including smallholder commercialization, medium and large scale commercial agriculture while others have adopted inclusive commercialization. However, the existing literature is inconclusive on which pathway should be adopted particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed at evaluating the most effective commercialization pathway (smallholder or inclusive) and its impacts on productivity and welfare on smallholder rice farmers in the pathways versus rain-fed farmers in Mbarali District. The study used cross-sectional survey data collected from a sample of 256 farm households. The data was analysed using output and input commercialization indices (CCI and ICI) and propensity score matching. Results indicated that, the overall output commercialization was more than half of the produced rice (CCI=59%) but the use of improved inputs in the study area was low (ICI = 27%). The proportion of rice sold was higher in the inclusive pathway (80%) relative to smallholder pathway (70%) and rain-fed scheme (41%). Total factor productivity ranged between 1.17 - 1.21 and 0.98 – 1.02 in the smallholder and inclusive pathways respectively more than the in the rain-fed scheme. Farmers in the smallholder and inclusive pathways earned between 7.65 – 7.68 million and 5.42 – 5.48 million TShs respectively more than farmers in the rain-fed scheme. For dietary diversity score, food consumption score and value of assets, inclusive pathway was better-off relative to smallholder pathway and rain-fed farmers. Based on these findings, smallholder pathway was effective in rice total factor productivity and income earned while the inclusive pathway was most effective in commercialization and welfare improvement. Since each pathway has some positive impact relative to the other, both smallholder and inclusive pathways should be adopted to explore the synergies. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sokoine University of Agriculture en_US
dc.subject Commercialization en_US
dc.subject Commercial agriculture en_US
dc.subject Smallholder rice farmers en_US
dc.subject Rice productivity en_US
dc.subject Mbarali district en_US
dc.subject Tanzania en_US
dc.title Commercialization pathways and their implications on smallholder rice farmers’ productivity and welfare in Mbarali district, Tanzania en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SUA IR


Browse

My Account

Statistics