Tools for delivering entomopathogenic fungi to malaria mosquitoes: effects of delivery surfaces on fungal efficacy and persistence
Loading...
Date
2010
Authors
Mnyone, L. L.
Kirby, M. J.
Lwetoijera, D. W.
Mpingwa, M. W.
Simfukwe, E. T.
Knols, B. G. J.
Takken, W.
Russell, T. L.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BioMed Central
Abstract
To eliminate malaria, vector control programmes will need to incorporate novel tools to complement the use of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). Both ITNs and IRS are highly effective against anthropophagic and endophilic species, but their efficacy is threatened by emergence of resistance to synthetic insecticides [1,2]. Therefore, the growing demand of the global community for non-chemical
control tools has refocused research objectives to address the practical aspects of biological control tools that have previously had limited uptake. Biological control tools have several advantages over chemical-insecticides. The most important ones include reduced risk of host resistance and minimal risk to the environment and living organisms [3,4]. Currently, a number of novel tools based on biological interactions are undergoing development including fungal, bacterial, viral and protozoan pathogens [5]. Of these, entomopathogenic fungi show considerable promise for development as biopesticides [6-10]. Fungus production and application all involve relatively simple infrastructure and processes
Description
Malaria Journal, 2010; 9 (246)
Keywords
Cotton Cloth, Indoor Residual Spray, Fungal Isolate, Entomopathogenic Fungus, Metarhizium Anisopliae, Malaria control