Browsing by Author "Marcossy, A. M."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Assessment of local government's social accountability for poverty reduction in Tanzania(2016-12-10) Marcossy, A. M.; Urassa, J. K.Social Accountability is an aspect of governance that links and interlinks other aspects of development and governance, In Tanzania, various forms of social accountability monitoring in have been implemented by CSOs, these include; the holistic st)~al accountability monitoring (SAM) and Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys, PETS, Others are Community Score Cards, Budget Analysis, Citizen Jury, Local needs analysis and Social Auditing. These initiatives fulfill a number of functions, as they enable individuals and user groups at community level to provide feedback and exercise their voice vis-a-vis central, local government and service providers. The main objective of this study has to establish the relationship between social accountability and poverty alleviation in a few selected Tanzanian local councils. Specifically, the study aimed at; describing the forms of social accountability in the selected local government authorities (LGAs), to determine the status of social accountability among the selected LGAs, to empirically link social accountability with identified poverty indicator and to examine the public's perception on social accountability and improvement of people's livelihoods. The study employed a cross-sectional research design whereby data were collected at one point and time. A total of320 respondents were randomly selected from the selected wards and villages using a multi-stage sampling technique from Mwanza City Council (MCC), Kinondoni Municipal Council (KMC), Kibaha Town Council (KTC) and Handeni District Council (HDC). In addition, forty and ten other individuals were involved in focus group discussion (FGDs) and key informant interviews respectively. The study used both primary and secondary data; the former was collected through the use of interview schedules and checklists. Specifically, the study employed Social accountability monitoring tools which included; the Social Accountability Cycle and the Question-Information-Analysis (QIA) tools. Data collected using the QIA were analyzed by the help of participant stakeholders; the CSOs, Businesses, LGA officials, a handful of policymakers and other participants. Generally, the study shows that SAM positively empowers local people not only to engage their governments but, does also influence decisions and the confidence of public officials in service provision. However, there are setbacks in enhancing social accountability in local governments in Tanzania. One such challenge is access to Government information which is inconsistent and preferential. This can further be deduced as showing a strong potential for linking poverty reduction initiatives with social accountability in local government.Item The linkage between social accountability and poverty in local government authorities in Tanzania(Sokoine University of Agriculture, 2016) Marcossy, A. M.The concept of social accountability is a bit new, studies on it are few and literature on its relationship with poverty alleviation, especially in Tanzania is scanty. The objective of the study was to establish the relationship between social accountability and poverty in the selected local councils in Tanzania. Specifically, the study sought (i) to describe and document the forms of social accountability in the selected local government authorities (ii) to determine the status of social accountability among the selected LGAs, (iii) to examine public perception of social accountability in their councils, and (iv) determine the link between social accountability and poverty indicators of the selected LG As. The study used a cross-sectional research design and combined both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Primary data were collected through questionnaire survey, key informant individual interviews and personal observations. Secondary data were obtained from reports and documentation from researched sources. Whereas secondary data were analyzed through Ethnographic Content Analysis (ECA) and Policy and Budget Analysis (PBA), the primary data were analyzed for correlation, regression and variation through a multinomial logistic model. The findings show social accountability is strongly linked to poverty levels in the councils; and that strengthening it can have strong impact in poverty reduction (p = 0.05). The study conclude that social accountability have direct impact to the poor people in Tanzania especially through its impact on planning, resource use and empowerment of local population; that is, changing the ease of getting access to resources and delivering services that brings the biggest reduction in sustained poverty of communities; improve governance and community empowerment; and improve citizen’s access to information and essential public services. The study recommends creation of enabling environment for civic groups’ to effectively implement social accountability initiatives including improvement in the legal basis of civic groups’ participation within institutions of public sector oversight; and well-defined procedures for encounters between citizens and public sector actors in the meetings. And that for a public institution to benefit most of the citizen’s accountability seeking initiatives, participatory mechanisms, have to be institutionalized to ensure participation of poor people and make the administration accountable.Item Social accountability and poverty reduction in Tanzania: a case of selected local government authorities(Tanzania Public Services College (TPSC), 2013-12) Marcossy, A. M.; Urassa, J. K.; Sinda, S. H.Accountability as a concept as per the Tanzania's central and Local Governments Authorities (LGA's) literally means the LGAs measure of compliance to government set guidelines and rules for financial, administrative and policy implementation as opposed to the public demand for accessibility to information, priority setting, peoples participation, public services and decision making. The practical evidence of failing development projects and programmes, deepening poverty, socio-economic inequalities and gender injustices present strong challenges, especially for initiatives under 'traditional' government approaches, resulting in demands for the rethinking of development. The current study mainly aimed at determining whether LGA's were socially accountable to their residents' thus contributing topoverty reduction. Specifically, the study aimed at assessing the LGA's budgetary allocation and utilization to the sectors of agriculture, health, education and infrastructure, which are important areas for poverty reduction. In collaboration with localpeople and their organizations and community groups, CSOs have been able to collect and analyze Council information deducting inefficiencies, lack of capacities, financial mismanagement; fund misuse, underutilization and under expenditures mostly on the development budget. These are some of the key indicators of lack of social accountability of the councils to the people they are supposed to serve. On the other hand, some Councils have indicated their willingness to account to localpeoples' concerns while addressing shortfalls and lack of capacity to implement what is expected of their dues.